Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| vitreoretinal_precursors_retinal_breaks [2026/02/25 18:23] – Scott Larson | vitreoretinal_precursors_retinal_breaks [2026/02/25 18:26] (current) – Scott Larson | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| * Monitoring recommended if asymptomatic with a consideration for prophylactic treatment in a fellow eye of those with retinal detachment. | * Monitoring recommended if asymptomatic with a consideration for prophylactic treatment in a fellow eye of those with retinal detachment. | ||
| ===Byer' | ===Byer' | ||
| + | * 276 consecutive patients with average 10.8 years follow-up (1-25 years) | ||
| * Subclinical retinal detachments 2.3% (10/423) eyes | * Subclinical retinal detachments 2.3% (10/423) eyes | ||
| * 1 disc diameter of subretinal fluid on all sides of the break | * 1 disc diameter of subretinal fluid on all sides of the break | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
| * 1 from a symptomatic retinal tear | * 1 from a symptomatic retinal tear | ||
| * Recommendations from this study | * Recommendations from this study | ||
| - | * Phakic eyes if asymptomatic should not a prophylactic treatment | + | * Phakic eyes if asymptomatic should not have prophylactic treatment |
| * Retinal detachment in the setting of vitreoretinal traction on lattice lesions containing round retinal holes is relatively common in the setting of significant myopia | * Retinal detachment in the setting of vitreoretinal traction on lattice lesions containing round retinal holes is relatively common in the setting of significant myopia | ||